House Bill Would End Federal Life Without Parole for Juveniles

Print More
JLWOP: Young man in orange jumpsuit behind bars.


An Arkansas congressman has introduced legislation that would end life without parole for juveniles locked up in the federal prison system and give inmates facing those sentences a chance at eventual release.

Rep. Bruce Westerman said it would give people “who strayed from the law during adolescence” the opportunity for a break on their sentences.

“This legislation does not guarantee release,” said Westerman, a Republican, in a statement released by his office. “Instead, it provides the opportunity for a rehabilitated individual whose crime was committed in his or her youth and who has served a minimum of 20 years to have a sentence reviewed by a judge to determine whether a second chance is merited.”

Spokesman Ryan Saylor said similar legislation had passed “with overwhelming bipartisan support” in Westerman’s home state.

“More and more states are introducing legislation like this,” Saylor said. “So the congressman wanted to use Arkansas as a model and bring this to the federal system as well.”

It wasn’t immediately clear how many of the more than 3,800 federal inmates serving life without parole are doing that time for crimes committed as juveniles. The bill has been sent to the House Judiciary Committee, which hasn’t set a hearing on it yet.

Westerman has the backing so far of three fellow House members — Lynn Jenkins, R-Kansas; and two California Democrats, Tony Cardenas and Karen Bass, who sits on the Republican-led Judiciary Committee.

The U.S. Supreme Court struck down automatic life-without-parole terms for crimes committed by teenagers in 2012 and made the decision retroactive in 2016, giving an estimated 2,500 people an eventual chance of release. Since then, 19 of the 28 states that allowed those sentences have taken that punishment off the books, along with the District of Columbia, according to the Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth, a justice advocacy group.

“We’re grateful that the inhumane practice of sentencing children to die in prison is being addressed at the federal level through the leadership of Congressman Westerman of Arkansas,” Jody Kent Lavy, the group’s executive director, said in a statement. The bill “is a reflection of our belief that there is no such thing as a throwaway child and that no child should be sentenced to die in prison.”

Similar language is included in a Senate bill backed by that chamber’s Judiciary Committee chairman, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.

The justices didn’t eliminate life without parole for juvenile offenders completely — they just barred its application without a hearing before a judge, who would be required to weigh mitigating factors before passing sentence. Judges must “take into account how children are different, and how those differences counsel against irrevocably sentencing them to a lifetime in prison,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the court in the 2012 case, Miller v. Alabama. And the justices made clear they expected the punishment to be “uncommon.”

The defendant in that case, Evan Miller, is still awaiting a judge’s decision after getting his new hearing last year. If his sentence is reduced, he will still have to serve a minimum of 30 years before being eligible for parole.

4 thoughts on “House Bill Would End Federal Life Without Parole for Juveniles

  1. I think we need to make a difference between a 17 year-old youth offender and a real child 12-15 years old who made a terrible mistake. When 17 years old who initially killed can be released after 20-40 years a some one who was a real child should have an opportunity to be released much sooner. Not to be mandatory released, but only if he/she already proved their rehabilitation by 7-10 years of good behavior.

  2. I don’t believe in Punishment until reviewed by a panel of humanists, psychiatrists, medical Drs and representitives from their faith. As well as families of the defendant and the injured parties. Nobody does anything for no reason especially children.
    I believe we need to rid ourselves of this archaic behavior as it was designed for no other reason than retribution. Our world today is so far advanced from those eras that we CAN do better. Our mission can be repairative to allow humans to lead more productive lives than ever thought possible.

  3. Pennsylvania has the largest number of juvenile-lifers, many serving sentences related to gang-related crimes from the 1960’s, 1970’s, 1990’s.
    Also, drug-related crimes from the 1990’s until now.
    Most are Black, Hispanic and come from the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh areas.
    The oldest juvenile-lifer in the WORLD is a man from Philadelphia who has been incarcerated as a juvenile since 1953-1954.

  4. It seems to me that any juvenile, who was/is sentenced to life in prison w/o parole must have committed a HORRENDOUS crime. I’d also like to know how many such sentences have ever been passed in the USA. If a jury ordered such a punishment, what was the crime??
    I don’t like the adjective “inhumane’ being applied w/o knowing how “inhumane” the defendant’s crime was!