North Carolina Advocates Hope to Work on Racial Bias in Wake of Raise the Age
|
Orange County in North Carolina has two school districts. One is much tougher than the other on students caught with marijuana on campus.
How Juvenile Justice Systems Must Balance Risk Assessment with Racial Equity
|
As the juvenile justice system has evolved, the use of statistics and data to inform decision-making have become commonplace. Risk assessment in...
Diversion, Positive Youth Development, Restorative Practices: Connecting the Dots
|
“Effective, evidence-based practices that support the wellness and resiliency of youth in school and in the community are emerging.” —Models for Change (2010)
How Tennessee Is Battling Disproportionate Minority Contact at State, Local Levels
|
Tennessee is in the infancy of its comprehensive juvenile justice system reform. However, some lessons have been learned. If racial and ethnic justice is a priority, every proposed provision of the reform must be viewed through a racial and ethnic justice lens.
We Need Stronger, Not More Simplified, Approach to Reducing Racial Disparities
|
Several states have announced they will continue collecting data on racial and ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system, five months after Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Administrator Caren Harp announced the agency is rolling back these reporting requirements. The announcements came in the chat box of an OJJDP webinar focused on federal data on girls in the juvenile justice system.
Most Juvenile Justice Reforms Happened at State Level This Election
|
Tuesday evening’s midterm elections were among the most closely watched in recent memory, in large part because of its potential implications at the national level. And there was certainly plenty of news there, but perhaps the bigger, untold story is what happened in the states. Some of the results may indicate a more progressive and comprehensive approach to justice and related issues.
OJJDP’s New Direction Is Juvenile Justice Policymaking By Erasure
|
The Trump administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ) and Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) have instituted policymaking by erasure. These agencies are rolling back juvenile justice data collection, rescinding manuals on best practices and changing policy language.
Public Safety Harmed in Reality By Excessively Targeting Youth of Color
|
The W. Haywood Burns Institute (BI) strongly rejects the disturbing and dangerous new policy direction of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) that insinuates that public safety is threatened by efforts to reduce racial and ethnic disparities (RED).
Sessions’ Withdrawal of Justice Department Manuals on DMC Leaves States ‘Directionless’
|
Seven documents juvenile justice agencies used to track disproportionate arrests of minority youth and compliance with other rules were among the two dozen federal guidance documents the Justice Department recently disavowed, sparking questions and concern across the field. Those documents were part of the batch of two dozen that Attorney General Jeff Sessions pulled back last week.
OJJDP Administrator’s Words on Racial Disparities Shock Us
|
Standing before a room packed with youth, juvenile justice advocates, system practitioners, law enforcement officials and judges last week, Caren Harp, Administrator of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), made an announcement: OJJDP would be “simplifying” the implementation and compliance of the core protections of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA).